FilmJerk Favorites

A group of unique directors and the essential works that you've got to see.

||| Francis Ford Coppola |||
Francis Ford Coppola

Coppola is an amazing talent whose inspiration and influence spans many generations. Virtually the link between the studio system of yesteryear and the independent minded filmmaker of the modern age, Coppola became the first major film director to emerge from a university degree program in filmmaking, thus legitimizing a now common route for many future filmmakers.

This Academy Award winner continues to enjoy an enormous critical and popular success due in large part to Coppola’s ability to break down an epic saga of crime and the struggle for power into the basic story of a father and his sons, punctuating the prevalent theme throughout Coppola’s oeuvre: the importance of family in today’s world. His personal portrait mixed tender moments with harsh brutality and redefined the genre of gangster films.

This intense, yet unassuming thriller has an impact that touches the viewer on a personal level and raises the question of privacy and security in a world of technology – thirty years ago! Coppola’s then virtually unknown cast is a roster of inevitable superstars, including Gene Hackman, Harrison Ford, and Robert Duvall. This Academy Award nominee for Best Picture, Best Original Screenplay, and Best Sound lost out to Coppola’s other great effort of the year, The Godfather: Part II.

Coppola's masterful Vietnam War-updating of Joseph Conrad's "Heart of Darkness" was the first major motion picture about the infamous “conflict”. This colossal epic was shot on location in the Philippines over the course of more than a year and contains some of the most extraordinary combat footage ever filmed. Unforgettable battle sequences and sterling performances from every cast member (including Marlon Brando, Robert Duvall, Dennis Hopper, Laurence Fishburne, Harrison Ford, Scott Glenn, and Martin Sheen) mark this Academy Award-winning drama as a must-see for any true film fanatic.

Recommended by CarrieSpecht

Advertisement

Roll Bounce

By BrianOrndorf

September 22nd, 2005

Bringing back roller-skating is no easy task, and “Roll Bounce” gets it half right. When focusing on the skates, the picture is a charmer, recalling the sweet neon-and-polyester glow of the 1970s. When director Malcolm D. Lee tries to shove drama into the film, “Bounce” dies quickly, needlessly weighing down the fun with lazy screenwriting.


The year is 1978, and Xavier (Bow Wow) and his friends are mourning the loss of the neighborhood roller rink. Searching for greener pastures, the boys bus themselves over to Sweetwater, the big city rink that hosts the roller-skating champion, Sweetness (superbly played by Wesley Jonathan). Dealing with potential girlfriends (Meagan Good), his stern father (Chi McBride), and grief for his dead mother, Xavier finds even more headaches when he finds himself in competition with Sweetness for king of the rink, and the outlook doesn’t look good for the amateur skater.

When one thinks of the late 1970s, the thought of a smiling person, clad in polyester, and gliding around on roller skates has to be one of the preeminent images that comes to mind. Not since the one-two punch of 1979’s “Roller Boogie” and 1980’s “Xanadu” has roller-skating been more affectionately realized than in Malcolm D. Lee’s “Roll Bounce.”

“Bounce” is a cheerful film, gregariously attempting to capture that small moment in time when roller-skating was king, and served as the true barometer for coolness in adolescent lives. Lee (“The Best Man,” “Undercover Brother”), a child of the 70s, is thorough in his recreation of the era, and gives heavy screentime to observing the pop culture of the moment, found in the birth of Atari, “Star Wars” posters, old Pepsi cans, and afros. Lots of afros. Lee isn’t afraid to get silly with “Bounce,” encouraging his actors to go broad in the roller rink sequences, and bringing in Wayne Brady (as the rink D.J.) and Nick Cannon (as the roller-skate manager) to make sure the audience knows that the film is a comedy, regardless if they can’t generate a single laugh between them.

However, as much as Lee is trying to drink in the neon glow of idealized childhood, he’s also under the impression that he must engage the heart; one minute the games of snaps are flying furiously, and the next feature stark moments of Xavier trying to deal with his mother’s death. While the performances are solid, the contrast between the bipolar moods of “Bounce” is far too great for the film to support, and it constipates the pace of the film to routinely bounce back and forth between domestic drama and era-specific silliness. In his desperate quest to inject some audience-pleasing sympathy into the script, Lee frequently blocks the sheer fun of the project, which is the only element he has in his favor.

I’m also surprised that Lee didn’t take more care with his dialog. With a film that is straining to recreate the 1970s in every way, Lee allows his cast to speak as if the film were shot two weeks ago, with liberal use of modern slang and exclamation. It certainly snaps the mind out of the 1970s quickly, which appears to go against Lee’s intentions.

The highlights of the film are the skate sequences, and they’re handled well by the production. Backed by a predictable, but warmly recognizable funk, disco, and soft-rock soundtrack, “Bounce” is wonderful just watching the dancing and gliding on the rink. And while clearly the actors are being helped considerably on the skates, they sell the joy of the sport well, especially Bow Wow, who has never been this likable onscreen before. Lee’s fondness for the roller rink culture is infectious, and “Roll Bounce” only comes alive when Lee pays attention to the magic of the skates. It’s just a crime that Lee is too frightened to give himself over completely to the moment.

My rating: C