FilmJerk Favorites

A group of unique directors and the essential works that you've got to see.

||| Sergio Leone |||
Sergio Leone

Leone’s career is remarkable in its unrelenting attention to both American culture and the American genre film, exploring the mythic America he created with each successive film examining the established characters in greater depth.

Only his second feature (a remake of Kurosawa’s Yojimbo), Leone's landmark "spaghetti western" caused a revolution and features Clint Eastwood in his breakthrough role as "The Man With No Name". This classic brutal drama of feuding families wasn’t the first spaghetti Western, but it was far and away the most successful up to that time.

Plot is of minimal interest, but character is everything to Leone, who places immense meaning in the slightest flick of an eyelid, extensively using the extreme close-up on the eyes to reveal any feeling, as demonstrated by Clint, who squints his way through this slam-bang sequel to A Fistful of Dollars as a wandering gunslinger that must combine forces with his nemesis to track down a wanted killer.

The final chapter in the groundbreaking trilogy follows Eastwood, Lee Van Cleef, and Eli Wallach as they form an uneasy alliance to find a stash of hidden gold. Leone focuses on his central theme as they find themselves facing greed, treachery, and murder, showing that the desire for wealth and power turns men into ruthless creatures who violate land and family and believe that a man’s death is less important than how he faces it.

Recommended by CarrieSpecht

Advertisement

Timeline

By BrianOrndorf

November 25th, 2003

The usually reliable Richard Donner drops the ball with this blurry medieval/time travel/adventure film. Hiring a trio of bad actors, namely the abominable Paul Walker, doesn’t help the veteran director much either.


A group of archeologists (including Gerard Butler, Frances O’Connor, Ethan Embry, and Rossif Sutherland) have made an amazing discovery at one of their dig sites: evidence that their professor (a fun Billy Connelly) is stuck back in the year 1357 and requests help to get home. His son, Chris (Paul Walker, where does one begin with this lousy actor?), demands answers, and gets them when representatives of a secret scientific research team usher him and his fellow archeologists to a remote base. It seems there has been an accidental “worm hole” opened during research for a “human fax machine,” and the professor got stuck where he didn’t belong. Chris and the gang are recruited to head back in time with a company man (Neal McDonough, “Boomtown“) and retrieve the professor before he’s lost to history forever, with only 8 hours in which to accomplish this mission.

What “Timeline” amounts to is a respected and trustworthy director falling prey to vile casting choices and unconquerably detailed source material. The film is one step above full out disaster, but who’s to blame? Director Richard Donner is one of most reliable talents in the industry, effortlessly guiding picture after picture to safe haven. From the “Lethal Weapon” series, to “Superman,” and even another medieval story, the cult hit “Ladyhawke,” Donner is a pro and knows how to direct a film cleanly. However, “Timeline” might have been a bad idea from the start. Taken from Michael Crichton’s bestseller, this is no easy adaptation like “Jurassic Park.”

Where Crichton had the benefit of hundreds of pages to explain just what in God’s name this plot is about, the film gives itself under two hours to tell this story. That isn’t nearly enough time to scratch the time travel surface, much less integrate an audience into the complex and expansive narrative of the film. The story is something about a “wormhole” and the need to retrieve a professor from doom and that‘s pretty much all we get. The film tries, with a clearly reshot scene (the cast is in awful wigs, and the cinematography brightens suddenly), to explain the necessities of the “time travel” reasoning, but it’s futile. Donner knows it, and keeps the scientific explanations to a blurry minimum, concentrating more on getting the action and romance in motion.

Another pitfall of Donner’s film is his cast. With Walker, O’Connor (“A.I.“), and Butler (“Dracula 2000”) as the three leads, all hope is lost. I haven’t seen a bad actor lineup like this in a long time, and the cast makes good on its promise to ruin the film with screeching, ferocious overacting and the inability to improv their way effectively through a scene - and why Donner chose this idea and speed for capturing his dialogue is even more baffling. The cast, who seem to find that yelling over each other must equal good acting in some psychotic way, bury most of the crucial expository dialogue. It must be stated again that Paul Walker cannot act, and faced with the prospect of watching him having to anchor this film is disappointing when real talents like Lambert Wilson (the Merovingian in the “Matrix“ sequels), Billy Connolly, and Anna Friel (as a French queen) are all left with thankless supporting parts. Walker’s dull surfer dude monotone ruins yet another film.

The major set piece of “Timeline” is the big climatic battle between the French and English armies, which employs flaming catapults, castles under siege, and damsels in distress. Donner is clearly in his element with this stuff, and anything to get the actors to stop talking was a welcome sight to these eyes. The other side of the story, where actor Ethan Embry has to out-ham the evil industrialist David Thewlis for control of the “fax machine,“ is equally as tedious as the medieval section and only serves a purpose to remind the audience of the clock that ticks down in big red numbers.

I really wanted to enjoy “Timeline” for what it truly is deep down in its black Crichton heart: a big, dumb action fantasy that could be easily digestible and provide some rollicking Saturday matinee entertainment. Outside of the big and dumb part, it fails on almost every other level. Hire Paul Walker, and that’ll happen.

My rating: D-